[antlr-interest] Re: Managed to compile under .Net !!

Terence Parr parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Sat Jul 5 13:52:18 PDT 2003


Does GCJ actually work these days?  It wouldn't even come close to 
compiling let alone running ANTLR when I checked months ago.

Ter

On Saturday, July 5, 2003, at 01:47  PM, micheal_jor wrote:

>> I can understand why you would not want this restriction. Actually
>> it is not a .NET exe that is important; a native exe would do. From
>> the perspective of people who only wish to use Antlr, and not build
>> it, the JVM dependency is a hefty bit of luggage with its own
>> versioning issues.
>
> You are absolutely correct about the usefulness of native binaries
> for the ANTLR tool itself.
>
>> That is all I meant. Many .NET developers don't
>> use the JVM at all anymore, except for things like Antlr.
>
> ;-)
>
> I actually agree with you on this. Unfortunately, J# is the only
> option available to me currently. GCJ doesn't do Windows executables
> AFAICT and I don't have TowerJ, JOVE or other similar Java-NativeCode
> compilers that do support recent versions of the Java2 platform.
>
> Perhaps someone on the list does?
>
> Micheal
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
--
Professor Comp. Sci., University of San Francisco
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
Co-founder, http://www.jguru.com
Co-founder, http://www.knowspam.net enjoy email again!
Co-founder, http://www.peerscope.com link sharing, pure-n-simple




 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




More information about the antlr-interest mailing list