[antlr-interest] Re: Problem with existence of the same literal in two rules

[ramyasivadas]

Hi,
Thank you so much for your reply.
Thank you for the efforts you have taken to explain the solution in 
detail.
I'm trying out the solution.

But when i define the STRING as follows,
STRING : ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z') ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z'|INT)*
the grammar doesn't compile at all.I think it gets caught in an 
infinite loop somewhere. My lookahead is 20. Do i have to change that?

I also tried defining STRING as 
STRING : ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z') ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z'|INT)+
Even this gets into an infinite loop.

Can you please suggest me a solution for defining the string.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Ramya



 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/