[antlr-interest] lecture audio versus video
John Allen Green
greenj at ix.netcom.com
Tue May 20 19:40:04 PDT 2003
I have an opinion, not about Real's codecs I'm afraid, but about Real
Player in general. Many people I know refuse to install Real because of the
"spyware" junk it installs on your system. It's somewhat of a nightmare to
get around it, too.
I wouldn't suggest that you *don't* provide Real streaming video, but I
would ask that you keep in mind that there may be plenty of people who
don't/won't have Real on their computers... please leave us with an
alternative. I imagine that as long as the audios are available, the unReal
among us will be happy.
Cheers,
John
--On 5/16/2003 10:17 AM -0700 Terence Parr wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Some of you have been listening to the lecture audios from my language
> course this Spring and I'm wondering if that is satisfactory or would
> streaming video be much better.
>
> Apparently, I can get a realnetworks.com server for linux that will
> push out video for free since it would be such low user/bandwidth
> volume. I can probably get the university to send a human to each
> class to video and then I can edit the DV tape on my Mac and push to a
> linux server. Anybody know anything about this or have opinions about
> real's codecs?
>
> Heck, I might just do some random lectures about various antlr topics
> and post them.
>
> Terence
> --
> Co-founder, http://www.jguru.com
> Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator: http://www.antlr.org
> Co-founder, http://www.peerscope.com link sharing, pure-n-simple
> Lecturer in Comp. Sci., University of San Francisco
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list