[antlr-interest] Re: how useful would a generic grammar "action" language be?

Terence Parr parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Tue Oct 28 09:57:02 PST 2003


On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 07:16 AM, micheal_jor wrote:

> Kunle had this to say (see below):
>
> FWIW, I kinda agree with him that a statement/expression level generic
> action language probably won't provide vastly improved cross-langauge
> reuse due to the differences in the libraries available on each
> platform. Not even for Java/C# despite their similarities.

Agreed.  Perhaps the generic language would have exprs, statements, and 
some predefined types like Map, Queue, Stack etc...  You know...all the 
things for symbol table management.  This might be all that we need for 
sem preds.  Hmm...

Ter
--
Professor Comp. Sci., University of San Francisco
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
Co-founder, http://www.jguru.com
Co-founder, http://www.knowspam.net enjoy email again!
Co-founder, http://www.peerscope.com pure link sharing




 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




More information about the antlr-interest mailing list