[antlr-interest] Re: another way to preserve token order in ASTs
Terence Parr
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Sun Aug 1 13:02:27 PDT 2004
On Jul 31, 2004, at 6:42 PM, thrutchy wrote:
> Yep, already read that. I like the method I have below because:
Ooops...Sorry.
> - changes were minimal (override one method in an AST)
> - AST nodes need no additional data (but I need one extra node per
> root - you could argue which is best)
> - I knew how to also preserve whitespace
> - it made more sense to me
Those are good reasons. I had trouble dealing with tokens not put into
the tree. How can I spit them back out!?
> I think the way I really would like to have done this would be to have
> a "left" children pointer in addition to current children pointer and
> sibling pointer. With AST nodes like that, these rules:
Yeah, double link would be nice.
Ter
--
CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com
Cofounder, http://www.knowspam.net enjoy email again!
Cofounder, http://www.peerscope.com pure link sharing
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list