[antlr-interest] Re: Bug in antlr.g?
Tiller, Michael (M.M.)
mtiller at ford.com
Mon Aug 2 13:37:22 PDT 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lgcraymer [mailto:lgc at mail1.jpl.nasa.gov]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:24 PM
> To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [antlr-interest] Re: Bug in antlr.g?
>
> --- In antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com, Terence Parr <parrt at c...>
wrote:
> > Hi. :)
> >
> > Well, this is antlr itself, right? so it is fine using purely
> > commontoken...it's in the generated parsers that it needs to be
>
> Ter--
>
> Ingo may still have a point that should be remembered for ANTLR 3.
> antlr.g could be a starting point for other tools that work on antlr
> grammars.
>
> --Loring
Not to mention the fact that people may look at antlr.g for examples of
how to do things (and that, as the author, you should lead by example
:-).
--
Mike
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list