[antlr-interest] Bug in ANTLR C# implementation
Bryan Ewbank
ewbank at synopsys.com
Wed Dec 1 06:39:05 PST 2004
> Furthermore it's not always a simple matter which factory
> should be used, at least in C++ you have to make sure you
> share the factory over the various treeparsers you have to
> prevent 'funny' behaviour..
My "solution" to this (I use a homogeneous AST) is to create a constructor
(target is C++) that accepts a Parser as an argument:
/**
* make this tree parser use the same ASTFactory as the given parser
*/
SymScan(antlr::LLkParser& parentParser) : antlr::TreeParser()
{
antlr::ASTFactory *p_factory = parentParser.getASTFactory();
initializeASTFactory(*p_factory);
setASTFactory(p_factory);
}
This way I avoid the excess code in the client, and all TreeParsers use the
same factory.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list