[antlr-interest] Re: updated "antlr 2 bashing list"
lgcraymer
lgc at mail1.jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Mar 9 13:29:55 PST 2004
I agree wholeheartedly with Monty's request, but would generalize it a
bit. If you rewrite loops as recursive constructs, syntactic
predicates work. The broader goal should be that logically equivalent
constructs should behave similarly--refactorings need to be supported.
--Loring
--- In antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com, Terence Parr <parrt at c...> wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2004, at 12:05 PM, mzukowski at y... wrote:
>
> > Oops, I mean a syntactic predicate? The details are hazy, but I
> > remember
> > wanting to code a loop that says "if you see this, then break out of
> > the
> > loop", as opposed to the "if you see this then match the following
> > rule."
>
> Added to your hate list ;) I hope that the LL-regular stuff will
> handle this.
>
> Ter
> --
> Professor Comp. Sci., University of San Francisco
> Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
> Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com
> Cofounder, http://www.knowspam.net enjoy email again!
> Cofounder, http://www.peerscope.com pure link sharing
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list