[antlr-interest] Re: Java runtime
Tiller, Michael (M.M.)
mtiller at ford.com
Fri Mar 12 10:29:29 PST 2004
I don't understand this issue. The original poster asked that the Java
runtime not be included for C++ projects. On the face of it, this sounds
like quite a reasonable requirement and as far as I know it is satisfied by
Antlr 2.x.
Has it been stated at any point that this won't be true for Antlr 3.x?
--
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John D. Mitchell [mailto:johnm-antlr at non.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 12:56 PM
> To: antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [antlr-interest]Stuff I like about ANTRL Re:
> stuff I don't
> like about ANTLR 2.x
>
>
> >>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Youngman
> <Anthony.Youngman at ECA-International.com> writes:
> [...]
>
> > But (and this is addressed by the current C++ output and the planned
> > "emit any compatible language" module) it is NOT reasonable
> to force us
> > to require that our users have Java installed. Once we've
> generated our
> > lexer/parser/compiler, we need to be able to distribute that as a
> > stand-alone that doesn't have problematic dependencies ...
>
> So you're wanting someone to reimplement the Antlr run-time for every
> single, supported action language? Ouch.
>
> Take care,
> John
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list