[antlr-interest] lexical nondeterminism
Mike Lischke
lists at lischke-online.de
Sun Mar 28 08:09:52 PST 2004
> Given that rules are handled in a greedy manner I don't see
> where there is an ambiquity. There is no definition for a
> pure sequence of digits in the floating point literal so such
> an input should really only match the integer literal rule.
> Where is my mistake of understanding?
I saw, a similar question was discussed already yesterday. I searched for the wrong keywords in the archive so I did not find these messages. Sorry for that.
On the other hand however I tried the supposed solution and found it not working (it was as if I had not specified the greedy option). I also read the help and tried to understand what I can do, but still have no idea.
Mike
--
www.soft-gems.net
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list