[antlr-interest] Re: "protected" lexer rules

[Thomas Rolfs]

Terence wrote:


> INT : (DIGIT)+ ;

> local
> DIGIT : '0'..'9' ;

> Hmm..not bad.

How about "explicit", as in C++? Or some word that means the rule must be
invoked or referenced from another rule.

-- 
Thomas Rolfs



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/