[antlr-interest] Re: "protected" lexer rules
Lubos Vnuk
lubos.vnuk at rts.at
Thu Nov 11 03:45:48 PST 2004
> Sure it can and that's the whole point...
> "sub" is a very ambiguous qualifier.
Alright, point taken. I have checked with the Meriam-Webster Online
dictionary and it is rather ambiguous on "sub-"
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=sub
But as Terence wrote in another post he would go for "fragment" in
ANTLR3, don't you think that "fragment" has, based on your objection
that "subtoken" might mean a part of a rule, the same problem?
Cheers,
Lubos.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list