[antlr-interest] BENCHMARK. ANTLR. Bad results.
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Fri Nov 12 18:17:54 PST 2004
On 11/13/04 2:10 AM, "Ric Klaren" <klaren at cs.utwente.nl> wrote:
> With the ANTLR3 C++ support code I'd rather make it easy to plug in own
> custom string classes than supply another string library that needs to be
> maintained (although people have offered custom string libraries) Also the
> unicode story will crop up pretty quick when we talk string classes.
May be this is good idea.
Then I think only real way -- to use Policy method (based on templates)
I.e. No virtual methods.
Just exists some pre-defined API.
If somebody want own string class, then he need to write small class that
repeat policy API and redirect calls to that string class.
Another way -- interfaces. But this bring overload of virtual calls.
3 times slow down on each call.
> I would prefer to have an even smaller core support lib than we have now
> (and provide more of the advanced features via example code).
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com
To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list