[antlr-interest] BENCHMARK. ANTLR. Bad results.

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 11/13/04 2:10 AM, "Ric Klaren" <klaren at cs.utwente.nl> wrote:

> With the ANTLR3 C++ support code I'd rather make it easy to plug in own
> custom string classes than supply another string library that needs to be
> maintained (although people have offered custom string libraries) Also the
> unicode story will crop up pretty quick when we talk string classes.

May be this is good idea.

Then I think only real way -- to use Policy method (based on templates)

I.e. No virtual methods.
Just exists some pre-defined API.

If somebody want own string class, then he need to write small class that
repeat policy API and redirect calls to that string class.


Another way -- interfaces. But this bring overload of virtual calls.
3 times slow down on each call.


> I would prefer to have an even smaller core support lib than we have now
> (and provide more of the advanced features via example code).

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/