[antlr-interest] java 1.4 as min value?

[Matt Benson]

I assume you refer to ANTLR 3.0's Java runtime since
the "Tool" couldn't work without that either, and the
restriction could only matter with regard to the
runtime.  You can ship ANTLR 3.0 with a 1.4-dependent
runtime library, but is there any practical reason why
a user couldn't supply their own backend for
compatibility with earlier Java releases if they
REALLY (, REALLY) needed to?

--- Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> wrote:

> 
> How do people feel about ANTLR 3.0 requiring 1.4 JDK
> or above?  I want 
> two things so far:
> 
> LinkedHashMap
> 
> and
> 
> memory mapped I/O
> 
> Thoughts?  Perhaps those using 1.3 are doing so for
> legacy reasons and 
> therefore are having to use 2.x version of ANTLR
> anyway.
> 
> Ter
> --
> CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San
> Francisco
> Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator,
> http://www.antlr.org
> Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com
> Cofounder, http://www.knowspam.net enjoy email
> again!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>     antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! 
http://my.yahoo.com 
 



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/