[antlr-interest] building ASTs for recursive lists
Lally Singh
lally.singh at gmail.com
Thu Nov 18 09:09:55 PST 2004
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:57:57 -0800, John D. Mitchell
<johnm-antlr at non.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Maassen," == Maassen, H A M <H.A.M.Maassen at student.tue.nl> writes:
> > logicalExpression : relationalExpression ( logicalOperator^
> > relationalExpression )*
> Well, note clearly that you have a sub-clause there which can be *zero*.
You mean the * matching nothing? What would I note it for? Sorry, my
last project was JavaCC, this is all still pretty new to me.
> > To build a proper tree. Why can't I? Or even better? How can I? "
>
> What do you mean by "proper"?
I just want something I can easily traverse with a tree parser. As
I'm even newer to that, the simpler the tree the better I figure.
Thanks for all your help!!
-ls
--
Evil will win because good is dumb.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list