[antlr-interest] Profiler 2

[Jim Idle]

However, would you not be an early adopter of the modified 2.7.5?
 
I like to think of it this way: you probably have a few more issues than normal with the development phase but at some point you produce a parser that you test the bejesus out of and it works. Once generated it will always work (within the limits of what you were able to test) and therefore it does not matter if it is generated by an early version of ANTLR3 or not. Might well be a bit early yet though, I agree ;-)
 
Jim
 

________________________________

From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org on behalf of Bryan Ewbank
Sent: Fri 12/2/2005 4:42 PM
To: ANTLR Interest
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Profiler 2



That does sound nice, but I'm working in a production environment
and cannot afford the risks associated with being an early adopter.

On 12/2/05, Jim Idle <jimi at temporal-wave.com> wrote:
> I would think that by the time you have changed the existing code generator
> either Ric would have finished the ANTLR3 c++ generator, or I will have
> finished the ANTLR3 C code generator. I think that either of these should
> make a project such as this unnecessary unless you absolutely must only use
> 2.7.x...
>
> ... or we both screw up ;-)
>
> Jim