[antlr-interest] "finally" blocks
christopher.d.schultz at comcast.net
Mon Jan 17 14:54:01 PST 2005
>>> In using ANTLR with Java, it would be nice to be able to specify
>>> "finally" blocks, e.g.:
>>Good idea Paul. Is there a decent equiv in all potential targets?
> I don't know about all targets, but C++ doesn't need "finally"
> because C++ has destructors. The only reason Java needs
> "finally" is because it doesn't have destructors.
I think that's a flawed comparison. Destructors are in C++ what
finalizers are in Java. A "finally" block is different. I agree with
Brian Ewbank's comments that Java-style "finally" behavior can be
achieved in C++. About all you need is "goto" with an in-scope return
value in the function.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20050117/c44d67d3/signature.bin
More information about the antlr-interest