Separate list was Re: [antlr-interest] ANTLR 3.0ea1 and ANTLRWorks 1.0ea1 released!

Matthew Ford matthew.ford at forward.com.au
Thu Jun 2 14:39:04 PDT 2005


Can we please have a separate list for ANTLRWorks so the main list is free
for the usual Antlr grammar problems.
matthew
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terence Parr" <parrt at cs.usfca.edu>
To: "ANTLR Interest" <antlr-interest at antlr.org>
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 2:08 AM
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] ANTLR 3.0ea1 and ANTLRWorks 1.0ea1 released!


> Thanks for all the feedback folks!!
>
> Note that it's early access (meaning it's nowhere near what we'd call
> an alpha release) so we are expecting lots of problems.  Also, a wide
> variety of different platforms/environments will definitely cause us
> trouble at first since we couldn't test it everywhere.  Java has
> truly shown it's "write once, debug everywhere" nature for Swing so far.
>
> Perhaps we messed up the jar.  I have been using ANTLRWorks to do my
> examples.  Works great for me.  Strange.  Yes, the console is full of
> "noise", but I asked Jean to put that in there so we can see any
> errors that pop up.  Naturally when you're typing a grammar, it's
> invalid until you finish the rule or whatever so you'll get lots of
> errors.
>
> Keep the comments coming!
>
> Ter
>



More information about the antlr-interest mailing list