[antlr-interest] Re: Semantic predicates that aren't & hoisting

[eprice at vettro.com]

David Jung <jungdl at ornl.gov> writes:

> Actually I was trying to simplify my description.  I'd like to have
> an optional semi-colon after the last expression.  This is so that
> users coming from java/C++ could write 'naturally' both:
>
> {
>   f();
>   g();
>   h();
> }
>
> and
>
> a = {f();g();h()};

Hmm, what about the following:

 if (foo) {};
 else {}

Should that be legal?

$0.02,
-Ed