[antlr-interest] Re: Semantic predicates that aren't & hoisting

[John D. Mitchell]

>>>>> "David" == David Jung <jungdl at ornl.gov> writes:
>>>>>> John D. Mitchell said:
[...]

>> Ugh.  Notice how your example input is actually malformed...

> My input is not mal-formed with respect to what I want to achieve
> (i.e. the original problem I posed), but it is mal-formed according to
> the grammar you've proposed.  That is why I couldn't see how that grammar
> solves my problem - it doesn't.

Ugh.  Sure it does.  You just didn't allow for multiple expressions at the
top level:

program : expr EOF ;

Follow the grammar and make it say what you mean (and make sure you mean
what you say (through the grammar :-)).

John