[antlr-interest] Yet another idea for a completlygenericTreeParser

Scott Stanchfield scott at javadude.com
Mon May 16 22:14:29 PDT 2005


Loring, I'm not getting into this argument with you again. Like I said, we
obviously don't agree and it's a waste of everyone's time.

People have heard both of our arguments (and know I'm right ;) ).

If this doesn't get into ANTLR I'll have to do it myself, because there's no
way I'm going through the overhead of tons of extra nodes or object pooling
to avoid the extra nodes if I can just have a single model object.

End of line.

-- Scott




More information about the antlr-interest mailing list