[antlr-interest] votes on rule+ vs (rule)+
Arnar Birgisson
ArnarB at oddi.is
Thu May 19 01:18:17 PDT 2005
+1
Arnar
>>> Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> 18.5.2005 18:15:32 >>>
Hi,
I'm leaning towards allowing rule+ as Scott and others have asked
for. I usually am for consistency, but I'm wondering if this is a
case where consistency with "standard" EBNF is better than forcing
the ANTLR consistency that all subrules have parentheses.
Please, no long arguments! A simple +1 or -1 or 0 will suffice with
a few comments if you want.
Thanks,
Ter
--
CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list