[antlr-interest] Re: bad generated code?

[Christian Bird]

I'll trim them down.  Would you like me to post them to the list or
mail directly to you?  Thanks for your help.

-- Chris

On 10/3/05, Ric Klaren <ric.klaren at gmail.com> wrote:
> Terence Parr wrote:
> >> Tree parsers have to be k=1 because they are actually two dimensional
> >> and it gets too weird to allow k>1.  Syntactic predicates should
> >> work, though.
> >
> >
> > Hi :)  ANTLR v3 allows k>1 lookahead trivially I'm happy to say.  I
> > didn't have my brain working for v2 ;)
>
> Though it looks like a bug for v2 ;) I browsed a bit around in the
> changelogs and the code earlier this evening. I'm not sure where it's
> triggered. I would currenlty guess in the analysis since there's no
> changes (I think) in the codegenerator that could do this (or this is a
> sleeper bug). For some reason it uses k > 1, anycase the && between the
> terms looks strange... can it have to do with semantic predicates?
>
> The (trimmed down) grammar files would be a help to track it down.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ric
>


--
Christian Bird
cabird at gmail.com