[antlr-interest] Re: ANTLR Works and compiler settings...

[Jean Bovet]

Interesting... so with 1.5 is does not work but with 1.4 it works?

Jean

On Apr 14, 2006, at 4:58 AM, Rob Greene wrote:

> Update:
>
> After sending my email, I realized that I did have a 1.4 JDK  
> installed, and that does work.
>
> So, maybe this is a report that the Java code generation does not  
> compile without tweaking under Java 5.0.  :-)
>
> Thanks!
> -Rob
>
> On 4/13/06, Rob Greene <robgreene at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a trick to getting ANTLR Works to compile a grammer and  
> working in the debugger?
>
> When I have com.sun.tools.javac selected, I get the following  
> error: "Compiler exception: com.sun.tools.javac.Main"
>
> When I have javac (but not path) selected, I get: "Compiler  
> exception: CreateProcess javac -classpath ... error=2"
>
> When I have javac with path to Java 5.0, I get: "Cannot launch the  
> debugger.  Time-out waiting to connect to the remote user." and the  
> console shows:
>     [23:10:34] Note: C:\Temp\ANTLR\BasicBasic.java uses unchecked  
> or unsafe operations.
>     [23:10:34] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
>     [23:10:41] Launch with path =C:\Temp\ANTLR\classes;C:\Temp\ANTLR 
> \antlrworks- 1.0ea8.jar;C:\Temp\ANTLR\antlrworks-1.0ea8.jar;.
>
> Does the Java code generated work with Java 5.0?  (Yes, I do get  
> java files created.)  Do I need to downgrade to Java 1.4 while  
> developing in ANTLR Works?
>
> Besides that, this has a lot of promise.  I'm hoping that once the  
> debugger is functional, I will be able to actually run the grammar  
> against a file and see whatever output I need to produce?  Is ANTLR  
> v3 considered stable enough that I should use that, still as a  
> beginner, over v2?
>
> Thanks!
> -Rob
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20060415/ab8752d0/attachment.html