[antlr-interest] anybody get bitten by ANTLR's AST interface requirement

[Gokhan Caglar]

I would prefer if the AST could be derived from classes that are not in the
antlr namespace, Interface or abstract base class...
Gokhan



On 1/17/06, Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> wrote:
>
> Howdy, i'm working on tree parser error recovery over next few
> days...my efforts are hampered by my earlier decision to not require
> nodes to answer any interface...i use an adaptor for construction and
> navigation.  No biggie.  However, it sure would be nice to say "all
> antlr trees satisfy the Tree" interface.  This is what v2 does (AST
> interface).  Was this a huge problem for anyone?
>
> Ter
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20060117/ec5e2a10/attachment.html