[antlr-interest] 3.0 final will require t.g has t in it

[Sohail Somani]

On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 16:50 -0700, Terence Parr wrote:
> Just a friendly warning...we agreed that CParser.g should have  
> grammar CParser in it not whatever you want.  We'll need to find  
> grammars and vocabularies soon...this will break some examples that  
> use java.g for JavaParser inside...

Phew. Finally. Writing build tools to work with antlr is quite a task
otherwise...

Are we also going to require that *only* t exists in t.g?

It would make things a lot easier...