[antlr-interest] 3.0 final will require t.g has t in it

Micheal J open.zone at virgin.net
Fri Jul 7 19:14:05 PDT 2006


> > On Jul 7, 2006, at 5:45 PM, Sohail Somani wrote:
> > Are we also going to require that *only* t exists in t.g?
> > 

> On Jul 8, 2006, at 02:06 AM, Terence Parr wrote:
> Yep.  One grammar per file.
> 
> Ter

Did you mean one explicit grammar per file?. IIRC, parser grammars can
define a lexer implicitly.

Incidentally, (a) how would such a lexer be named? and, (b) was the @header
issue resolved? (i.e. @header contents not getting into implicitly defined
lexers).


Micheal

-----------------------
The best way to contact me is via the list/forum. My time is very limited.



More information about the antlr-interest mailing list