[antlr-interest] 3.0 final will require t.g has t in it

[Terence Parr]

On Jul 10, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Martin Probst wrote:

>>>  So "grammar MyLang" would generate MyLangParser.(java|tokens)
>>> and MyLangLexer.(java|tokens).
>>
>> Heh, that's pretty good!  Anybody object to this?
>
> Well, why would you want to expose the Lexer as a top-level class  
> if the user didn't even declare it explicitly? Have it be a nested  
> class within the parser, that would keep the user surprise as low  
> as possible.

That would make the file too big to debug sometimes; java has weird  
limits.  Also, it's a convenience but it doesn't change the fact that  
ANTLR is generating parser and lexer from that grammar.  THough I  
guess you're right...one could pass the input stream to the parser  
and ignore the lexer..hmm...anybody have an opinion?
Ter