On May 17, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Kay Roepke wrote: > On 18. May 2006, at 2:13 Uhr, Terence Parr wrote: > >> Good point. It would have to go like this: >> >> T.g: >> grammar T; >> >> TLexer.g: >> grammar TLexer; > > Ok, so the naming of the implicit lexer in combined grammars would > have to change, too, right? Yup. Ter