[antlr-interest] 2nd and Subsequent References in Action to Non-Terminals Generate Incorrect Code

[Kay Roepke]

On 22. Nov 2006, at 18:32 , Randall R Schulz wrote:

> It appears that within any given parser rule only the first
> alternative's action can successfully refer to (non-assigned)
> non-terminals.

I have just committed the fix to the depot. 'Twas a headscratcher ;)

You can get the latest version from <http://fisheye2.cenqua.com/ 
browse/~tarball=tgz/antlr/antlr.tgz>
Should be up any minute.

cheers,
-k
-- 
Kay Röpke
http://classdump.org/