[antlr-interest] A newbie question and is this mailinglistablack hole for

[Foolish Ewe]

Hi Dave:

Actually I'm pretty overjoyed at the help you offerred, and I'm the one
who is sorry for putting you and the other folks out.  You can call me Bill,
I have needed an account without my name for usenet posting for the last 
several years,
my last name is unfortunately unique and leads to oodles of spam :-(, hence 
the
"pseudo-anonymous" account for things like mailing list postings.

Thanks for the hint, it is still an avenue I'm explorig (even with the 
hoisting issues).

Bill M.

>From: David Holroyd <dave at badgers-in-foil.co.uk>
>To: antlr-interest at antlr.org
>Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] A newbie question and is this 
>mailinglistablack hole for
>Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:47:39 +0000
>
>On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:47:02PM -0700, Loring Craymer wrote:
> > Congratulations!  You have discovered the lack of
> > semantic predicate hoisting in ANTLR 2!
>
>Eek!  Sorry Foolish Ewe, I forgot to say that I was executing that trick
>in an ANTLR3 grammar (didn't realise this wouldn't work in v2).  Forgive!  
>:(
>
>
>dave

_________________________________________________________________
Get today's hot entertainment gossip  
http://movies.msn.com/movies/hotgossip?icid=T002MSN03A07001