[antlr-interest] Lexer and Parser class packaging

[Terence Parr]

On Feb 5, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Gavin Lambert wrote:

> At 08:30 6/02/2007, Jim Idle wrote:
> >One possibility though is to not have a default for the @header {}
> >which will then just leave @lexer::header and @parser::header,
> >which are probably more obvious.
>
> IMO, @header should either go to both files or it should produce an  
> error message telling the user to go use @lexer::header or  
> @parser::header instead.  Having it just assume the parser:: prefix  
> just doesn't feel right -- especially if you're using type-hinting  
> file extensions such as .g3l & .g3lp.


So @members {int i;} should also code to both parser and lexer. Which  
makes you feel more uncomfortable? the inconsistency or the fact that  
@header doesn't go to both? ;)

Ter