[antlr-interest] Tree grammar for 'zero or more' rewrite
Terence Parr
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Wed Jul 11 16:00:21 PDT 2007
On Jul 11, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Ted Villalba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write the tree grammar that will recognize the output
> from the following rewrite rule:
>
> value : (terms-> ^(TERMS terms)) ((WS)+ operator (WS)+ v=value ->
> ^(operator $value ^(VALUE $v)))*
Can you draw the empty, one term, then two term case for me?
The tree seems a bit weird to me. I think i can simplify the grammar
for me if you show me your intentions.
Ter
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list