[antlr-interest] C# 2.0 ANTLR grammar

[Lloyd Dupont]

You probably have to use semantic predicate.
I'm building a C#/XAML expressions grammar for a home project.
I have somethin like that:

================
compare
 : (shift -> shift)
  (
   ( op=(LT | GT | LTE | GTE) s=shift -> ^($op $compare $s) )
   // not really a comparison, but same priority
  | ( is='is' i=identifier -> ^( IS[$is] $compare $i ) )
  | ( as='as' i=identifier  -> ^( AS[$as] $compare $i ) )
  )?
 ;

//....................................

// here XAML like name definition, I had too much problem with the DOTs....
classname
 : (
   { IsClass(input.LT(3).getText(), input.LT(1).getText()) }? xaml=ID COLON 
id0=ID -> ^( CLASSNAME $id0 $xaml )
  | { IsClass(input.LT(1).getText()) }? id1=ID -> ^( CLASSNAME $id1 )
  )
  (
   ( genericparam )=> genericparam -> ^( CLASSNAME $id0? ^(XAMLNS $xaml)? 
$id1? genericparam )
  |
  )
 ;
// obviously genericparam is never ever called from somewhere else that 
classname
genericparam
 : LT classname (COMMA classname)* GT -> ^(GENERICTYPE classname+)
 ;

================

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Yury Serdyuk" <Yury at serdyuk.botik.ru>
To: <antlr-interest at antlr.org>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 7:43 PM
Subject: [antlr-interest] C# 2.0 ANTLR grammar


> Hi !
>
> Does a version of C# 2.0 antlr grammar exist?
> Namely, how to support generics in it without
> conflicts with "<" ( or ">" ) operators ?
>
> Best wishes,
>                   Yury Serdyuk
>