[antlr-interest] parameterized maps as arguments to rules??

[Jim Idle]

Let's please not have this discussion yet again. All possible views and
variants of views have been expressed about this many times and nothing
will change unless Ter wants it to so let's press on with something
useful ;-).

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
> bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Eric Taucher
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 1:25 PM
> To: antlr-interest at antlr.org
> Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] parameterized maps as arguments to
> rules??
> 
> I also have to add "antlr-interest at antlr.org" in the "To" for a reply
> when
> using Microsoft Outlook. Another news group I use works great.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
> > bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of scott at javadude.com
> > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:17 PM
> > To: Randall R Schulz
> > Cc: antlr-interest at antlr.org
> > Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] parameterized maps as arguments to
> rules??
> >
> > On any mail client I've used I don't get "antlr-interest at antlr.org"
> added
> > unless I do a reply-all. (And when I do that, people complain that
> they
> > get the note twice unless I remove their email from the TO)...
> >
> > Is the list working differently for others?
> > -- Scott
> >
> > > On Monday 18 June 2007 12:25, scott at javadude.com wrote:
> > >> [I hate having to hit "reply all" on this list and then adjusting
> the
> > >> TO and CC! Grrrr!!!]
> > >
> > > You should direct your "Grrrr" to the author of your email client
> > > (evidently a rodent of some sort).
> > >
> > > That, or get a better one. I don't have to perform the
machinations
> you
> > > describe.
> > >
> > >
> > > RRS
> > >