[antlr-interest] Definite (but manageable) bug in antlr

[Terence Parr]

On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Harmon Nine wrote:

> Thanks.  3b1 does not have the bug (also found the post from July 3rd,
> doh!).
>
> BTW, is it normal to have to decrease the value of k (say from '*'  
> to 2)
> when using syntactic predicates in order to get the generated  
> parser to
> work correctly?

k is just an optimization really though it does allow some things to  
work (but usually just when antlr says it has failed).

Ter