[antlr-interest] IDE Integration

[Jim Idle]

Sounded good right up until the bit where it said:

"Configuration files are Python scripts--use the power of a real programming language to solve build problems."

Think I'll stick to gmake.

Jim Idle (Quietly petitioning Eric to withdraw permission for the use of the name).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
> bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Arnulf Heller
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 11:21 PM
> To: Dan Delorey; antlr-interest at antlr.org
> Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] IDE Integration
> 
> Hi,
> 
> take a look at SCONS: http://www.scons.org/
> 
> I don't work with it right now but I intend to. It seems to be very
> powerful and provides a platform independent build system for C/C++,
> Java, ANTLR, ...
> There are also plugins available for IDEs (al least VS.net and eclipse)
> 
> hth,
> a
> 
> At 07:08 23.04.2008, Dan Delorey wrote:
> >Could anyone advise me on a good integrated build mechanism for
> >projects that include ANTLR grammars? I've looked into both Ant and
> >Maven v2, but I'm not sure which (if either) to use. I've tried
> >Maven and found it to work until I changed my grammar so that it
> >requires ANTLR 3.1. The Maven plugin seems to always use 3.0.1 and I
> >have not been able to convince it otherwise.
> >
> >Any help or suggested readings are appreciated.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Dan