[antlr-interest] IDE Integration

[Johannes Luber]

Jim Idle schrieb:
> Sounded good right up until the bit where it said:
> 
> "Configuration files are Python scripts--use the power of a real programming language to solve build problems."
> 
> Think I'll stick to gmake.

What is so badregarding the use of Python? Besides that it is Python.

> 
> Jim Idle (Quietly petitioning Eric to withdraw permission for the use of the name).

Which Eric? And what name?

Johannes
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
>> bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Arnulf Heller
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 11:21 PM
>> To: Dan Delorey; antlr-interest at antlr.org
>> Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] IDE Integration
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> take a look at SCONS: http://www.scons.org/
>>
>> I don't work with it right now but I intend to. It seems to be very
>> powerful and provides a platform independent build system for C/C++,
>> Java, ANTLR, ...
>> There are also plugins available for IDEs (al least VS.net and eclipse)
>>
>> hth,
>> a
>>
>> At 07:08 23.04.2008, Dan Delorey wrote:
>>> Could anyone advise me on a good integrated build mechanism for
>>> projects that include ANTLR grammars? I've looked into both Ant and
>>> Maven v2, but I'm not sure which (if either) to use. I've tried
>>> Maven and found it to work until I changed my grammar so that it
>>> requires ANTLR 3.1. The Maven plugin seems to always use 3.0.1 and I
>>> have not been able to convince it otherwise.
>>>
>>> Any help or suggested readings are appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dan
> 
> 
> 
>