[antlr-interest] Slightly different C-Parser

[Swapna R (GS-EC/EDG5 - RBIN/EMT2)]

Dear All,
 
 I think my question was not clear. 
 
 I downloaded the GNU C grammars but it is not supported in antlrworks
1.1.6. Can we find these grammars for this version ?
 
 The parser we need has to work in a environment where some of the
includes are missing and also for one single macro there could be
multiple definitions. 
 
 So for these to satisfy we would require to take certain deviations
from the GNU C parser. IS this a good idea ? Do you suggest that we
should write entire parser according to our needs ?
 
 Anyone of you please respond.
 
regards,
Swapna

________________________________

From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
[mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Swapna R
(GS-EC/EDG5 - RBIN/EMT2)
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 8:33 AM
To: antlr-interest at antlr.org
Subject: [antlr-interest] Slightly different C-Parser



Hello, 

 For my project work I need to parse C-files. Sometimes It can be that
not all header files are present. I have found the GNU-C grammars. 

 Is it a good idea to change these grammars for specific use-cases ? How
do you suggest me to go ahead ? 

 Incase of code not conforming to C-syntax instead of generating a
exception I want it to continue further and just creating a problem
statment for the problematic code.

Can you anyone of you help me ? This is very important as we are under
pressure to take decision about the parser. 

Regards, 
Swapna 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20080205/297c9844/attachment.html