[antlr-interest] ANTLR could not analyze...

[Jim Idle]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Bennett [mailto:stevagewp at gmail.com]


> On 2/17/08, Steve Bennett <stevagewp at gmail.com> wrote:
> > ANTLR will re-analyze the decision with a fixed lookahead of k=1.
> > Consider using "options {k=1;}" for that decision and possibly 
adding
> > a syntactic predicate.
> 
> ...
> 
> 
> > As you can see, I'm using options k=1, and no shortage of syntactic
> > predicates - what else can I do?
> 
> Any response to this one? It seems to be a bug. Is there anything I
> can do about it?

I doubt it is a bug, but it is possible. Are using backtrack=true? I 
think that that will be necessary for what you are parsing, as though 
you could probably find ways around it, I am not sure you would end up 
with anything better than backtracking with memorization in this case. 
Also, give the latest snapshot a try and see if you get anything 
different, just in case.

Jim

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Jim Idle.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 1863 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20080218/f304015f/attachment.vcf