[antlr-interest] Re : Re : Combining jars

[Stanislas Rusinsky]

For ease of use you could also propose a grouped jar (antlr-runtime-all-3.1.jar) combining antlr-runtime-3.1.jar stringtemplate-3.2.jar in addition. This would allow to use only one jar  for every use case, one for the tool and one for the runtime, even if you use templates. Does that suggestion sounds good to you?

Stanislas.



----- Message d'origine ----
De : Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu>
À : Stanislas Rusinsky <rusinskystanislas at yahoo.fr>
Cc : antlr mailing list <antlr-interest at antlr.org>
Envoyé le : Mercredi, 30 Juillet 2008, 23h35mn 35s
Objet : Re: [antlr-interest] Re :  Combining jars


On Jul 30, 2008, at 1:12 PM, Stanislas Rusinsky wrote:

> Hello Terence,
>
> it is a good idea and as long as it is clearly stated in the  
> documentation it would ease the use of ANTLR for newcomers, versions  
> are not so straightforward to get together by now, your simplified  
> packaging proposal is convenient.
>
> Having twice stringtemplate does not look problematic to me, as it  
> is "packaging" for simplicity sake.
>
> May I suggest having one shared version scheme for both ANTLR and  
> runtime packages? (something like antlr-full-3.0.jar and antlr- 
> runtime-full-3.0.jar for example?)

Yes,How about

antlr-all-3.1.jar (everything needed to run the tool)
antlr-runtime-3.1.jar
stringtemplate-3.2.jar


> Thanks for your great work,

Thanks for using it :)

Ter



      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr