[antlr-interest] AntlrWorks 1.2b2 and Incompatible Grammar with sample code

[Jean Bovet]

This has been fixed in the beta 3 that I just released.

Regards,

Jean

On May 29, 2008, at 5:11 AM, Sebastian Mattsson wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Installed 3.1b to get to try out the nice new features.
> However when I pasted the simple example from the wiki:
> grammar T;
> options {output=AST;}
> @members {
> static class V extends CommonTree {
>
>   public int x,y,z;
>   public V(int ttype, int x, int y, int z) {
>     this.x=x; this.y=y; this.z=z; token=new CommonToken(ttype,"");
>   }
>   public V(int ttype, Token t, int x) { token=t; this.x=x; }
>
>   public String toString() {
>     return (token!=null?token.getText():"")+"<V>;"+x+y+z;
>   }
> }
> }
> a : ID -> ID<V>[42,19,30] ID<V>[$ID,99] ;
> ID : 'a'..'z'+ ;
>
> WS : (' '|'\\n') {$channel=HIDDEN;} ;
> AntlrWorks first tells my that it's an Incompatible Grammar, and  
> then it can't find the class V, just says 'undefined reference'  
> about <V>.
> After debugging the console outputs:
> [org.antlr.works.debugger.tree.DBASTModel - event 12] Warning:  
> [addChild] Child node 2 not found, ignoring.
> [org.antlr.works.debugger.tree.DBASTModel - event 14] Warning:  
> [addChild] Child node 3 not found, ignoring.
>
>
> Are these some kind of problems to be expected with the beta-version  
> or have I done something wrong?
>
> Thank You,
> Sebastian