[antlr-interest] Number tokenizer vs. number grammar
toddobryan at gmail.com
Sat Nov 15 12:50:26 PST 2008
Assume that that both 2 * 3+2i and 2*3+2i should lex as NUMBER OP
NUMBER. What does that determine about my possible approaches? :-)
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Sam Harwell
<sharwell at pixelminegames.com> wrote:
> The problem you'll encounter is order of operations. If the following is
> valid in your language:
> 2 * 3+2i
> Then is the result supposed to be 6+2i or 6+4i? What about 2*3+2i?
> How the language treats order of operations will determine your possible
> -----Original Message-----
> From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
> [mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Todd O'Bryan
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:36 AM
> To: antlr-interest at antlr.org
> Subject: [antlr-interest] Number tokenizer vs. number grammar
> (One warning--I'm new to ANTLR so I haven't wrapped my brain around
> syntactic/semantic predicates and may have missed something obvious
> there that would make this trivial.)
> I'm parsing a language that allows a great range of number constructs.
> 1, -3, 3.14, -5.8, 2/3, -3/-5, 3+2i, -4+i, 5-i, -3/5+2/3i, 3/5-2/3i,
> 7+2.3i and some other things are all legal numbers.
> For the language grammar itself, it would be very nice to just have a
> NUMBER token, but it would also be nice to have the ability to parse
> numbers into component parts since creating a complex number involves
> calling a constructor with the two real parts. The other tricky thing
> is that whitespace is irrelevant in the language grammar, but relevant
> in parsing numbers. For example, 3+ 2i (with a space before the 2) is
> not a legal number.
> I've thought about identifying a NUMBER token in the grammar and then
> calling a number parser on that token as part of processing, but what
> I'm afraid of is keeping the number parser and the NUMBER token in
> sync. What I'm feeling like is that I need token fragments in the
> language grammar that aren't fragments but are actual tokens in the
> number grammar.
> Am I missing a simple way to deal with this or is this just a nasty
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
More information about the antlr-interest