[antlr-interest] wildcard in tree grammar
Terence Parr
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Sat Nov 29 16:20:08 PST 2008
I agree. '.' as root should be ok. I'll have to go back and make it
context sensitive. Right now, '.' can be a subtree as well. it would
mess up analysis.
Ter
On Nov 29, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Gavin Lambert wrote:
> At 09:58 30/11/2008, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> >Hmmm. Just checked that with the latest snapshot of ANTLR 3.2,
> >but it really does not work, but it should, right? Why can "."
> >not be a tree root?
>
> Yes, that's what Sam Harwell and myself were discussing earlier in
> this thread; I think we agree that this should be considered as valid.
>
> (I gave a detailed description of how I think it should behave
> earlier on, but the general idea was to make ANTLR parse the tree as
> if it were a "real" tree rather than the "flat" tree that it's
> actually implemented as.)
>
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list