[antlr-interest] Antlr dependencies

[Torsten Curdt]

Not only claiming :) Savings can be huge. Even when you strip just on  
a class basis.

http://vafer.org/blog/20060110134647

There is also jarjar and proguard.

cheers
--
Torsten

http://vafer.org/blog
http://twitter.com/tcurdt

On Oct 30, 2008, at 16:16, Laurent Caillette wrote:

> Maybe you could consider using a jar obfuscator, which shortens method
> names and removes unused code. Tools of that kind claim to make the
> code 30% smaller.
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Jim Idle <jimi at temporal-wave.com>  
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 23:51 -0300, me tk82c wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jim,
>>
>>    We're talking about a JAR file of 1.4mb that is huge to many  
>> cell phones
>> :-(
>>
>> No, you are looking at the wrong Jar :-). That is the jar that  
>> contains the
>> tool and so on. The runtime  only jar is currently:
>>
>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 jimi jimi 138042 2008-10-28 15:47
>> antlr-runtime-3.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
>>
>> You can probably make this smaller by un-jaring it, and removing  
>> some of the
>> debugging and string template stuff (assuming that you are not  
>> using that).
>> Check with reference to the source. Hmm, maybe I can make a  
>> deployment
>> target for Maven with an ME oriented runtime that is smaller than  
>> that, but
>> you can certainly do it manually, unjar, carefully remove .class  
>> files you
>> don't need (and that are not essential), rejar.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>>
>> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
>> Unsubscribe:
>> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
>>
>>
>>
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
>