[antlr-interest] ANTLR Javadocs
Terence Parr
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Tue Aug 25 16:37:01 PDT 2009
On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote:
> David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
>> Terence Parr wrote:
>>> hi. not sure what's wrong with the doxygen..can you be more
>>> specific?
>>
>> Suppose someone wants their javadoc implementation to include links
>> into ANTLR classes. They could run javadoc on the full ANTLR source,
>> or they could just use the "-link <url>" option of javadoc to point
>> to somewhere on the ANTLR site. The latter is much easier, and
>> doesn't
>> require them to ship the ANTLR documentation with their own
>> documentation.
>
> Specifically, it has to be javadoc because of the specific directoy
> structures and suchlike used by javadoc, including a specific file I
> forget the name of, that it uses to figure out which classes are under
> which URL.
thanks everyone. I see the issue now. Yes, ANTLR should have a
standard documentation but unfortunately we have doxygen at the
moment. since it is just Java, though, can I just run Java doc on
everything and put it at a standard place on the website? It would
have to include a version number as you say.
ter
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list