[antlr-interest] Debug issues

[Dennis Brothers]

Yes, it should certainly be something other than the simple "DEBUG"  
that Visual Studio uses.  "ANTLR_DEBUG" is good.

     - Dennis Brothers

On Feb 5, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Johannes Luber wrote:

>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Johannes Luber wrote:
>>
>>> Sam Harwell is already trying to untangle the problem with the
>>> constructors for the CSharp3 target. Hopefully I can port back  
>>> this to
>>> CSharp2 without much difficulty, although it would be a good idea,  
>>> if
>>> all targets would support this. You can use preprocessor  
>>> directives in
>>> the meantime to ease the switch between debug and non-debug in the
>>> meanwhile.
>>>
>>> Johannes
>>>
>> Is there a "debug" pre-proc symbol defined in the generated code?  I
>> didn't see one, but if there is I can conditionally compile a
>> constructor in the @members section.
>>
>> Thanks -
>>     - Dennis Brothers
>
> There isn't one available yet, though one can be certainly  
> introduced. Should it be a separate DEBUG symbol like ANTLR_DEBUG?  
> Using DEBUG would probably collide with using the -debug option.
>
> Johannes
>>
>>
>> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
>> Unsubscribe:
>> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email- 
>> address
>
> -- 
> Jetzt 1 Monat kostenlos! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL
> für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/? 
> ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
>