[antlr-interest] Q: opinions on ikvm + antlr3 ?

C. Mundi cmundi at gmail.com
Fri Feb 6 08:16:53 PST 2009


Thanks.  That seems to be the consensus forming here.  I'm asking you guys
because you are the experts and I should listen to that.  Maybe I'm making
this harder than I have to.  I'll share any results I get with IVKM.

Cheers!
C. Mundi


On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Jim Idle <jimi at temporal-wave.com> wrote:


> It's an interesting idea, but I would say that so long as you are using a
> released version, then apart from bugs, you would expect the same behavior
> and features from the C# runtime probably more than any other runtime, just
> because the gestalt of C# and the .Net runtime are a lot closer than that of
> say C and Java.
>
> So, I guess that if we assume IKVM works as advertised, then it would be
> valuable IF you really do need to stay on the edge of the Java runtime
> development. Perhaps you might if you are doing research, but generally I
> have a hard time thinking that you would need to do this really.
>
> I am interested to hear of your experiences with IKVM though!
>
> Jim
>
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe:
> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20090206/f5af15d8/attachment.html 


More information about the antlr-interest mailing list