[antlr-interest] How to do complex Tree Pattern Matching

[Gerald Rosenberg]

At 02:07 PM 9/12/2009, Terence Parr wrote:

>On Sep 12, 2009, at 12:06 AM, Gerald Rosenberg wrote:
>>Given an existing AST with the two paths:
>
>i'd recommend doing ^(m .*) match and a pred in front that says
>hasAncestor(a) or something
>Ter

OK, I completely missed BaseTree#hasAncestor

Regards the "or something,"  TreeParser#inContext would seem to be 
it.  However, that method seems to have gone missing from 3.1.3 (it 
was in 3.1.2, but is still absent in 3.1.4).  Is there a reason that 
method got pulled?

Thanks.