[antlr-interest] Request for Change regarding Lexer (?)
Terence Parr
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Tue Feb 16 10:44:03 PST 2010
The key to your question was:
"and it occurred to me that ANTLR does not really inspect follow set, it
seems to inspect only what's left in the rule itself."
That improvement/bug is what I intend to fix :) Actually, ANTLR v4 lexers will just plain work better (i.e., more like what you expect) ;)
Ter
On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Marcin Rzeźnicki wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for quick reply.
> Anyway, I am not sure whether I understand this RFI you wrote, but if I do then what I am suggesting is way simpler to implement because the "next token analysis" part is left to the user. I am not sure whether I see all the issues clearly.
>
> 2010/2/16 Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu>
> http://www.antlr.org/jira/browse/ANTLR-189
> Ter
> On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Marcin Rzeźnicki wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Greetings
> Marcin Rzeźnicki
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list